🔗 Share this article

Just two days before the New York mayoral election, Michael Lange made a significant electoral prediction – not just the winner citywide, but block by block. Lange, a political analyst born and raised in the city, devoted more than ten years in left-leaning activism and has become something of a well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious while missing Andrew Cuomo’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. Lange possesses a talent for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the “capitalist corridor” on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and financial newspapers outrank the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Election Night Patterns and Unexpected Results

What was your election night?

It was necessary since they were dropping around 200,000 votes into the tally every few minutes! I was actually a little nervous initially: The candidate led the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came large groups of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

You know, it was possible where yesterday went somewhat badly for Mamdani, where Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the earlier contest. However the winner added 500,000 votes to his primary coalition, and that’s a huge reason why he succeeded. He went out and massively expanded his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He assembled the alliance that the left long aimed for: it’s multiracial, youthful, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He gained significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, compared to the earlier election. Additionally he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He created the coalition that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, tenants and people squeezed by affordability

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is this significant?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported Trump last year backed Zohran now. However I wouldn’t say he was gaining white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Turnout and Effects

A major development of the night was the record turnout. Who benefited?

Each candidate. Turnout was much greater than I had expected. I thought it could exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was equally driven, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now it appears he’s favored to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. So it’s not certain, but I think it’s likely, and I wish he achieves it because afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote completely collapsed.

He didn’t win a single precinct in any area. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and then added all of these Republicans on the island who had a strong turnout. I think there was significant tactical voting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for Cuomo, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome unless the winning alliance failed to expand.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your often-discussed “commie corridor” – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those areas of Brooklyn and Queens?

In my view existed a little dilution of the progressive zone in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. In Astoria, instance, the property owners and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. But overall, largely the commie corridor is a key factor why Mamdani won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Is there any suggestion that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with a lot of non-religious and left-inclined voters – like specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts such as the Manhattan area, his Middle East stance was influential there. Likewise in the moderate communities like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they favored the independent. And also, there are Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly Cuomo. So I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but he retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and including sections of the Upper West Side by big margins.

Political Impact

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Absolutely, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest figures from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will come from these areas to be elevated nationally.

However I believe that every city in America can have similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the epicenters of progressive influence in America – since they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where individuals struggle by the inequalities exist.